Executive Summary
Your concept at a glance
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 9 - Jul 14
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
The Entrepreneur's Source Franchise Business Plan 2026 UpdatedWhat Does the The Entrepreneur's Source Franchise Business Plan Contain? You receive a comprehensive, investor ready business plan in an editable Microsoft Word format, complete with a 5 year financial model and franchise specific content. [dynamic_pic1] Executive Summary Your concept at a glance [dynamic_pic2] Products & Services What you sell and why [dynamic_pic3] Market Analysis Market size and rivals [dynamic_pic4] Marketing & Sales Plan
What Does the The Entrepreneur's Source Franchise Business Plan Contain?
You receive a comprehensive, investor-ready business plan in an editable Microsoft Word format, complete with a 5-year financial model and franchise-specific content.
Products & Services
What you sell and why
Market Analysis
Market size and rivals
Marketing & Sales Plan
Channels, promotions, conversions
Management & Organization
Team roles and org chart
Financial Plan & Metrics
P&L cash flow break-even
Editable in Word, Docs & Pages
Edit fast on any device
What Is Included
All core chapters included
Six Questions Your The Entrepreneur's Source Franchise Business Plan Must Answer
We developed this franchise unit business plan in Microsoft Word using our own independent research into the franchise coaching and consulting industry. All six chapters are pre-written with data specific to opening and operating a career transition coaching business, projecting first-year revenue of $255,000 and growing to $825,000 by year five. The entire document is fully editable to match your specific goals and local market conditions.
Executive Summary
What is the core business opportunity?
The opportunity is to launch a franchise consulting unit in a prime territory, targeting high-net-worth 'corporate refugees' seeking a transition to business ownership. The model leverages a proven, proprietary coaching process to guide clients, generating revenue from franchise placement commissions.
Key Opportunity Drivers
- Targets a growing market of executives pursuing a corporate executive career change.
- Utilizes a structured, low-risk franchise discovery process to build client trust.
- Operates in a high-density professional corridor to maximize client access.
[dynamic_pic9]
Products & Services
What exactly does the business sell?
The business provides high-touch, personalized career transition coaching for professionals exploring franchise ownership. It doesn't sell franchises directly but rather offers expert guidance, education, and access to opportunities through a structured discovery process.
Core Service Offerings
- One-on-one coaching using a proprietary framework to define career goals.
- Educational seminars to attract and inform prospective franchise investors.
- Curated franchise matching based on a client's financial and lifestyle objectives.
[dynamic_pic10]
Market Analysis
Who are the target customers?
The primary customers are mid-to-senior level executives, often from the local finance and technology sectors, who are dissatisfied with the corporate world. These 'corporate refugees' have the capital to invest and are actively seeking an entrepreneurial career path with less risk.
Primary Customer Segments
- High-net-worth professionals seeking to diversify their investments and career.
- Displaced executives looking for a structured path to business ownership.
- Professionals in prime business districts exploring alternatives to a traditional job search.
[dynamic_pic11]
Marketing and Sales Plan
How will the unit acquire customers?
Customer acquisition will be driven by a multi-channel marketing strategy focused on building authority and generating qualified leads. The plan blends digital outreach with in-person networking and educational events to attract professionals ready for a career change.
Customer Acquisition Channels
- Hyper-targeted LinkedIn campaigns aimed at executives in specific industries and locations.
- Monthly educational seminars and workshops to build a local prospect pipeline.
- Strategic referral partnerships with local outplacement firms and business alliances.
[dynamic_pic12]
Management and Organization
Who will run the business?
The business will be led by the franchisee, who brings extensive professional experience, supported by a small, efficient team. The initial staffing plan includes a Senior Franchise Coach to manage client relationships and an Administrative Coordinator to handle operations, ensuring consistent execution of franchise standards.
Key Roles and Responsibilities
- A hands-on owner-operator driving strategy, marketing, and key partnerships.
- A full-time Senior Franchise Coach responsible for executing the coaching process.
- Support staff, including an Associate Coach and Marketing Coordinator, added as revenue grows.
[dynamic_pic13]
Financial Plan and Metrics
What are the key financial projections?
The financial plan requires an initial investment to cover the $75,000 franchise fee and startup costs, with a total payback period of 5 years. The business is projected to achieve positive EBITDA of $39,000 in its second year and grow revenue to $825,000 by year five, demonstrating a scalable and profitable business coaching model.
Financial Highlights and Metrics
- Revenue is driven primarily by placement commissions, projected at $120,000 in year one.
- The unit is forecast to reach breakeven within the first month of operation.
- Key performance indicators include client acquisition cost, conversion rate, and average placement fee.
[dynamic_pic14]
The Entrepreneur's Source Franchise Business Plan Template Features & Benefits
Pre-Written and Customizable Business Plan
Time-Saving, Fully Editable Template
This franchise business plan template is fully pre-written, saving you dozens of hours on research and writing, while also being 100% editable in Microsoft Word. This combination gives you a professional, franchise-compliant structure that you can easily customize to reflect your local market, financial assumptions, and specific strategy for your career transition coaching business model. It's the fastest way to create a plan that meets franchisor and lender expectations.
- Franchise-Ready Content: Pre-populated with industry-specific data for a franchise consulting unit.
- Fully Customizable: Easily edit text, tables, and financial figures in Microsoft Word.
- Professional Structure: Follows a standard format that lenders and franchisors expect to see.
Financial Projections and Revenue Model
Franchise-Specific Financials Included
The template includes a complete, five-year financial model with detailed projections for your franchise unit, including startup costs, operating expenses, and revenue assumptions. These figures provide a clear financial roadmap, helping you understand the funding required, evaluate profitability, and present a credible case for your small business ownership plan. You can easily adjust the numbers to test different scenarios for your entrepreneurial career path.
- Detailed Projections: Includes a 5-year Profit & Loss, Cash Flow, and Balance Sheet.
- Startup Cost Breakdown: Itemizes initial investment needs, from franchise fees to working capital.
- Clear Revenue Streams: Models income from placement commissions, coaching, and seminar fees.
Cost-Effective Business Planning
Save Time and Money
Using this franchise consultant business plan is a highly cost-effective solution that helps you avoid the high fees of hiring an outside consultant. It saves you critical time and money, allowing you to allocate more of your capital toward the franchise fee, marketing, and essential working capital needed for a successful launch. This is a practical tool for anyone serious about their franchise investment guide.
- Reduce Consulting Fees: Avoid spending thousands on professional business plan writers.
- Accelerate Your Launch: Get your plan done faster and focus on securing funding and your location.
- Allocate Capital Smarter: Invest your savings directly into your business operations.
Investor Appeal
Lender-Ready and Professional
Our business plan for professional coaching and consulting services is designed to make a strong, professional impression on lenders, investors, and the franchise approval committee. The clear financial logic, organized structure, and comprehensive market analysis demonstrate a thorough understanding of the business, improving your credibility and supporting your funding requests. It's built to get you from application to approval faster.
- Build Credibility: Presents a well-researched and serious business case.
- Support Funding Requests: Provides the detailed financial data that banks require.
- Franchisor-Approved Format: Aligns with the information franchisors need to see from candidates.
Complete Business Overview
Comprehensive and Well-Structured
This template provides a complete overview of your proposed franchise unit, covering the mission, target market, local positioning, operations, and unique value proposition. It gives you a well-structured narrative for presenting your vision within the framework of the franchise brand. This is one of the key steps to starting a franchise coaching business on the right foot.
- Clear Mission & Vision: Articulates the purpose and goals of your local unit.
- Detailed Market Analysis: Defines your target customer and competitive landscape.
- Operational Plan: Outlines how you will run the business day-to-day to meet brand standards.
How to Use the Template
Download and Open:
Purchase the template and download it immediately. Open and edit it seamlessly using Microsoft Word or Google Docs, making it easy to start working on your business plan right away.
Customize with Your Details:
Modify each section to align with your business concept, industry, and financial goals. Personalize the content to reflect your target market, unique value proposition, and key financial details.
Complete Financial Projections:
Leverage the provided example financial projections or seamlessly incorporate your specific figures, utilizing an optional financial model available for purchase.
Finalize Your Business Plan:
Conduct a thorough review of your business plan, refining the content to ensure it's investor-ready and serves as an effective operational guide.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 129 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 3
Good to excellent content - terrible publishing policy
Format: Hardcover
Lewis (Not "Flewis") wrote a decent text a number of years ago. It was then expanded to a companion volume (Analytical Sedimentology) with another author. The two nicely complement each other but the mind boggles at a price of almost $100 per each. The publisher has clearly made little effort to control the cost. Redundancy between the two volumes is excessive, hard cover rather than soft is used and, indeed, both could easily have been combined in one less pricey volume. A valuable resource to students and professionals has therefore been compromised by publisher, author or both due to ignorance, greed or stupidity. A terrible shame!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 5, 1998
★★★★★ 5
An Excellent Introduction to Legal and Constitutional Reasoning
Format: Hardcover
This is an excellent introductory volume for people who feel confused by the debate over "original intent" versus a "living Constitution." David A. Strauss is a law professor at the University of Chicago. His book is a quick read (139 pages), with no notes, bibliography or other impedimenta - just an index. It's a very lucid explanation of legal reasoning and how the Supreme Court has followed this basic process over time. Hence the "living constitution" is really just an instance of the English common law tradition functioning normally. This book will teach many Americans how legal reasoning actually operates in practice. It is a common-sensical and conservative process that seeks at once to promote predictability and fairness. By and large, it has worked well.
The phrase "living Constitution" has been denigrated by people who seek to turn back the calendar to a day when more "traditional" values were imposed by law. In so doing, they have invoked an historical fiction, the "original intent" of the framers of the Constitution. The myriad problems arising from this effort, if not its disingenuousness, have been discussed with insight and erudition by such excellent minds as Jack Rakove ("Original Meanings")and Akhil Reed Amar ("The Bill of Rights," and "The American Constitution: A Biography"), to name just two.
The real point of this book, I think, is to explain basic legal reasoning to a mass audience. This does a great service. It also shows how naturally the common law evolves, how it tends to restrain judicial activism and yet to permit flexibility as times and circumstances change. As Dean Roscoe Pound of the Harvard Law School put it in his book, "The Spirit of the Common Law," the common law is "essentially a mode of judicial and juristic thinking, a mode of treating legal problems rather than a fixed body of definite rules...." This is a critical distinction. Some so-called conservatives insist that judges must simply apply the law like automatons, as if it were a "fixed body of definite rules." They then seek to enlist the founding fathers in declaring what those rules are, or how definite they must be. But as Dean Pound and centuries of legal history demonstrate, this notion is far removed from the truth, and remote from any useful notion of adjudication. All Anglophone law schools, lawyers and judges are engaged in the process Dean Pound discusses.
The common law tradition arose in England over the course of centuries. We imported it to this country in part because it was workable and practical, and because it was brilliantly and systematically expounded by Chief Justice Edward Coke in the 17th century and by Lord William Blackstone shortly before the American Revolution. No one would suggest that the common law tradition means the law is the captive of judges' subjective whims. Such an assertion would have sounded ludicrous to the English as well as to the founders. But as Strauss - and volumes of legal history - unsurprisingly demonstrate, the common law tradition is the key to constitutional interpretation.
The common law is an inherently conservative instrument. It evolves incrementally. Those who complain about the "living Constitution" argue that judges merely rule according to their subjective prejudices. They contend that it is the legislative branch that should be charged with interpreting the Constitution. Of course, all three branches of government must interpret the Constitution from time to time. But the legislative branch should not have the last word in determining whether its own enactments meet constitutional scrutiny: To borrow from Chief Justice Coke, no one (including the legislature) may be the judge of his own cause. The function of determining whether legislation conforms to the Constitution has been and still is wisely confided to the courts, which by virtue of centuries of practice (as reflected in published opinions) have substantial expertise in the area and are independent. One also hears complaints that judges are insulated from reality. But courts are not insulated - they are independent. And they are independent precisely so they are not subject to being influenced by lobbyists or terrified by a challenger in a primary election.
To show how the common law works, Strauss discusses the evolution of constitutional thought in relation to two major issues: freedom of speech and segregation in public schools. He explains how the "clear and present danger" test in freedom of speech cases evolved, implicating not just such considerations as the threat of imminent harm, but also that some kinds of speech have lower societal value (libel, obscenity, fighting words), while other kinds of speech have more societal value (great literature, political speech).
Strauss goes on to discuss how Brown v. Board of Education (1954) was far less a radical overturning of an entrenched precedent, Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), than a logical step in the development of the law. In so doing, he uses an example from the law of torts, where customers injured by dangerous products originally were barred from suing the manufacturer unless they had a contractual relationship with it. At first, the fact that a product was inherently dangerous overcame the requirement of a contractual relationship. As it became harder to draw a line between ordinary products and those that were inherently dangerous, however, the old requirement of a contractual relationship was found to have outworn its purpose and customers were permitted to sue the manufacturer who had created a foreseeable risk of harm. Thus, in products liability cases, as in racial equality cases, the law evolved to meet the new demands posed by changed circumstances. Strauss shows the development of the law by discussing cases on racial equality decided after Plessy that gradually undercut the Plessy decision until it was no longer tenable.
Strauss does what law professors do every day: teach the law by showing how it evolved. His explanation, however, is so concise and clear that it makes the discussion seem not just sensible but compelling. Thus we see that the law works.
As Strauss points out, we never wrangle over some constitutional issues because they are cut and dried (you have to be 30 years old to be a senator) or because certainty is required (January 20 is the day the new president takes office, no matter how unstable the current domestic or world situation). Other provisions require more effort to interpret, but this is because the founders brilliantly provided that some matters could be spelled out specifically in advance, while others would have to be expressed in more general terms, which could be adjusted to changing needs and times (e.g., the "necessary and proper" clause in Article I, Sec. 8).
Interestingly, Strauss does not consider amendments to the Constitution to be part of what makes it a living document, since the amendment process is so onerous, slow, and seldom used. He points out how some amendments merely ratified the status quo, or served to clean up outliers, resolved technical issues, or were ahead of their time. As he offers these judgments, which seem balanced and reasonable, he also explains some of the less familiar amendments in a way that will have readers raising their eyebrows and saying "Oh, so that's where that came from."
At the outset of the book, Strauss sets out three objections to originalism:
That it is often, as a practical matter, impossible even for professional historians to discover what the intentions were of various founders with respect to matters discussed in the Constitution.
That even if an intent of the founders could be discovered, it would pertain to the understanding they had about their world: how does one go about trying to fit that understanding to our world?
That as Thomas Jefferson pointed out, one generation is to another as one sovereign nation is to another. The world belongs to the living. The notions of people long dead cannot bind us in the present or future.
Strauss correctly observes that the third of these objections is by itself fatal to originalism.
The founders were not so impressed with themselves that they felt their "intentions" should be forever imposed on posterity. Had they been dedicated to such a dubious project, they would surely have done a better job of documenting their debates and compromises during the Philadelphia convention. But little remains of those deliberations aside from the notes kept by James Madison. The Constitution, moreover, reflects their understanding that the future could not be shackled forever to the time in which they lived. They realized that the slave trade, for example, would prove intolerable and therefore provided that it could be abolished by at least 1808. So was their "original intent" to permit the slave trade, or was it that the slave trade should be abolished? And what does this say, if anything, about their intentions toward the institution of slavery - a word that did not even appear in the Constitution until the Thirteenth Amendment was adopted in 1865?
Most damning of all to the originalist position is what Thomas Jefferson said on the subject.
In a letter dated July 12, 1816, to Samuel Kercheval, Jefferson wrote
"Some men look at constitutions with sanctimonious reverence, and deem them like the arc of the covenant, too sacred to be touched. They ascribe to the men of the preceding age a wisdom more than human, and suppose what they did to be beyond amendment. I knew that age well; I belonged to it, and labored with it. It deserved well of its country. It was very like the present, but without the experience of the present; and forty years of experience in government is worth a century of book-reading; and this they would say themselves, were they to rise from the dead. I am certainly not an advocate for frequent and untried changes in laws and constitutions. I think moderate imperfections had better be borne with; because, when once known, we accommodate ourselves to them, and find practical means of correcting their ill effects. But I know also, that laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths disclosed, and manners and opinions change with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also, and keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy, as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors."
He added, "Let us follow no such examples nor weakly believe that one generation is not as capable as another of taking care of itself, and of ordering its own affairs." He even called for revision of the constitution at stated periods.
While originalists would love to claim Jefferson as one of their own, his words - and indeed his whole life - prove that he was completely at odds with their approach.
Men like Jefferson and Franklin, who were devotees of science, were fascinated by the progress men could make in trying to understand and improve their lives. Jefferson was an eager student of nature and did considerable experimentation with crops on his plantation. He famously wrote his "Notes on the State of Virginia" to refute the widely read claims of the French naturalist Buffon about the supposedly weak, degenerate, and insipid life forms to be found in the New World. The idea that such men, who were committed to the growth of knowledge, would seek to confine all future generations to the limited understanding they possessed of the universe in 1787, is worse than laughable. It can only be explained by the polemical purposes of those whose arguments for a regressive social order are so feeble that they have to seek refuge behind an imaginary "original intent" that they erect - as if the founders wanted their limited knowledge and often unarticulated, conflicting, or ambivalent intentions to restrict the great national experiment forever.
Given the explicit language of Thomas Jefferson, quoted above, it is apparent that "originalism" actually belies and defies the express intent of Jefferson, one of the most eminent of the founders. It seems paradoxical but it was his original intent that his original intent should not govern future generations!
Original intent also appears anomalously restrictive when one considers that the founders never contemplated the existence of an Air Force, though they expressly provided for the Army and the Navy. And ask an originalist what the original intent was with respect to the Second Amendment's use of the term "arms." The founders had no concept of assault rifles or machine guns, let alone nerve gas, laser-guided bombs, predator drones, or nuclear weapons. How do we impose an intention on them to assert what they could not have foreseen, namely, that ordinary householders in the 21st century should have a personal, constitutional right to be able to obliterate a small army in a matter of seconds, based on the founders' notions about the 18th century saber, musket or pistol? Likewise, the Eleventh Amendment says nothing to prohibit a person from suing her own state - just other states. Yet even "textualists" read an unwritten provision into the Eleventh Amendment because it suits their view of how "sovereign" the states should be. When given this kind of a taste of their own medicine, originalists collapse in helpless sputtering and exasperation.
Exposed to Strauss' very sensible discussion, the concerns of originalists reflect opportunism and disingenuousness. After all, we should not expect lawyers and judges to become armchair historians, especially under the time pressures of litigation and in the face of hotly contested issues. We should not pretend the founders had some monolithic intent, least of all with respect to matters of which they had no concept. And as Jefferson pointed out, the relationship of one generation to another is like that of one sovereign nation to another: we cannot expect to bind future generations by the intentions of people who are long since dead.
In short, there will always be those who resist change and those who welcome it. If you really want to see "judicial activism" at work, you will not find much of it in the common law tradition. A far better example is the recent decision - by the so-called conservatives on the Supreme Court - in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2010
★★★★★ 5
An Excellent Read
Format: Kindle
The author talks about our constitution as a "living document" and expertly draws the distinction between this and the originalist interpretation as a "dead document."
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2018
★★★★★ 4
The Constitution: A Living or Static Document
Format: Hardcover
There has been a debate over the past several decades on whether the US Constitution is a living document that should be interpreted according to current mores and standards or whether it is a static document that should be interpreted using only the meaning found in the original wording of the document.
The author, in this book, makes the case that the Constitution is, in fact, a living document that should be interpreted by modern standards and by using principles of common law. There are examples given that, quite frankly, are very persuasive. For instance, if the Constitution were interpreted using original language, we would not have the freedom of speech that we now enjoy. A careful reading of the First Amendment will show that only Congress was prohibited from making laws that abridged free speech. There were no constraints on the states or on other governmental bodies.
Whether or not you agree with the author on how the Constitution should be interpreted, this book will make for some though provoking reading and interesting discussion. The book was well written, fairly easy to understand and should be read by all who are concerned about where the Supreme Court is now and where it is headed.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 23, 2010
★★★★★ 5
Clear, cogent, and illuminating
Format: Kindle
Clear, cogent, and illuminating explanation of the difference between two approaches to interpreting the Constitution: originalism and the Living Constitution
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 18, 2015
recommand products
CHEVROLET PERFORMANCE LS7 Rocker Arm Exhaust 1.8 Ratio 12579617
45.95
GIBSON EXHAUST Cat-Back Dual Split Exha ust System Stainless 66568
426.48
CHEVROLET PERFORMANCE Aluminum Valve Covers - BBC- Short 12495488
152.97
CHEVROLET PERFORMANCE SBC Vortec Eliminator Intake Manifold 12496822
299.48
G-FORCE Pants GF125 Child Large Blue 4127CLGBU
88.95